Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Madame Z's avatar

This exemplifies a contemporary occultist's perspective on Pan.

I would like to ask, however, how much of this understanding of Pan's nature is actually authentic to how ancient Greeks saw him; how much of Pan's role in initiation is historically rooted in ancient culture?

I ask because, having myself passed through a Crowley-Magick phase some years ago, I became aware of the fact that much of what contemporary occultism takes for granted about ancient deities is actually modern construct--a sort of Jungian "retconning" that has little to no basis in historical sources.

A great example is the equating of Hekate with the 'triple-goddess' construct, in which the 'triple' aspect reflects some universal feminine experience (Maiden Mother Crone). While Hekate was given the epithet Trivia (three-ways/paths), there is no evidence to suggest ancient peoples understood Womanhood as triune. Likewise. Lilith is not an ancient Mesopotamian goddess, but a fabulous invention on the part of Jewish Midrashim writers from the 13th century CE.

While I appreciate the relation of Pan with Nature, I suspect his initiatory role is a later invention. In addition, Pan's connection to sexuality seems contrived by 19th century preoccupations with a sort of biological vitalism, which is why Nietzsche would champion a similar figure in Dionysus, while Crowley would claim Pan for his own unique brand of psycho-sexual magick.

An answer on your part would be appreciated.

Expand full comment
Iatromantis's avatar

Any thoughts on people equating Pan with Dionysos?

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts